Shopping group health for your team
For decades, employer-sponsored health insurance in California meant one thing: a defined benefit. A company chose a group health plan (or a small menu of plans), managed the annual renewals, absorbed the premium hikes, and offered that exact coverage to its workforce. Today, a rapidly growing alternative has changed how companies structure their benefits: Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs), specifically the Qualified Small Employer HRA (QSEHRA) and the Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA).
These arrangements shift the model from a defined benefit to a defined contribution. Instead of buying a specific insurance policy for everyone, the employer provides a set monthly allowance of tax-free money. The employee uses that money to purchase their own individual health insurance policy—often through Covered California or directly from a carrier—and the employer reimburses them.
For business owners and HR leaders, deciding between a fully-insured group plan, a QSEHRA, or an ICHRA requires a granular understanding of compliance, employee classing, ACA affordability rules, and state-level dynamics. This guide provides a comprehensive breakdown of how these funding models actually work in California, who they are genuinely right for, and what the real administrative burden looks like day-to-day.
The traditional group health insurance model presents distinct challenges for modern workforces. Small businesses struggle with unpredictable, steep annual renewal increases. Mid-market and enterprise organizations with highly distributed teams find it nearly impossible to select a single carrier network that works equally well for an employee in San Francisco and an employee in rural Madera County.
HRAs resolve this by completely decoupling the employer’s health budget from the carrier’s network.
Under a defined contribution model (ICHRA or QSEHRA):
While both QSEHRA and ICHRA operate on this fundamental premise, their legal frameworks, eligibility rules, and compliance requirements differ drastically.
Created in 2016 by the 21st Century Cures Act, the Qualified Small Employer HRA (QSEHRA) was the original legislative answer to the defined contribution demand. It was designed specifically for small businesses that wanted to help employees pay for health coverage but lacked the resources or headcount to sponsor a formal group plan.
The most important distinction of a QSEHRA is its strict size limitation. To offer a QSEHRA, an employer must:
Unlike an ICHRA, which has no cap on how much an employer can contribute, a QSEHRA is subject to strict statutory contribution limits set by the IRS, which are adjusted annually for inflation.
When you set up a QSEHRA, you must offer it on the “same terms” to all eligible full-time employees. You can, however, vary the contribution amount based on two factors:
In California, many lower- and middle-income individuals receive Advance Premium Tax Credits (APTC) to heavily subsidize their individual health plans on Covered California. The interaction between QSEHRA and APTC is critical for HR leaders to communicate to their staff.
If an employee receives a QSEHRA allowance, they must report it to Covered California.
This means an employee cannot “double dip” by claiming their full tax credit from the government and their full tax-free allowance from their employer.
The Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA), introduced in 2020, revolutionized employer health benefits. Unlike QSEHRA, the ICHRA was explicitly designed to scale. It works for a 5-person startup, a 500-person mid-market company, and a 5,000-person enterprise.
ICHRA has no employer size cap and no IRS maximum contribution limit. It effectively scales to whatever budget and strategy the employer sets. More importantly, unlike a QSEHRA, an ICHRA can be used to satisfy the ACA’s employer mandate for organizations with 50+ FTEs, provided it is structured correctly.
The most powerful feature of an ICHRA is its sophisticated classing system. A traditional group plan often fails because an employer is forced to treat all employees identically, even if their compensation, location, or working hours vary wildly.
ICHRA solves this by allowing an employer to divide their workforce into legally defined “classes” and offer different benefits—or no benefits at all—to each class.
Under federal regulations, an employer can divide their workforce into the following 11 permitted classes and vary the ICHRA allowance by class:
Because you can combine classes, the flexibility is immense. For example, a California business could create the following structure:
A frequent question from HR leaders is whether they can keep their existing traditional group health plan for some employees and use an ICHRA for others.
The answer is yes, subject to the Same Class Rule.
You cannot offer an individual employee a choice between a traditional group plan and an ICHRA. Furthermore, you cannot offer a traditional group plan to one portion of a class and an ICHRA to the remainder of that same class.
If you want to mix models, you must draw a hard line using the permitted classes. For example, you could offer your traditional fully-insured Kaiser group plan to your Salaried employees, while offering an ICHRA to your Hourly employees.
To prevent employers from creating hyper-specific classes to effectively discriminate against high-risk or unhealthy individuals (e.g., trying to push a single sick employee onto the individual market by creating a “class” just for them), the IRS enforces Minimum Class Size rules.
If you are offering a traditional group plan to at least one class and an ICHRA to another class, the ICHRA class must meet these minimums:
(Note: These minimum size rules generally only apply if you are mixing a traditional group plan with an ICHRA, or differentiating between salaried and hourly, or full-time and part-time. If you offer an ICHRA to all employees, or differentiate solely by geographic rating area, the minimum size rules usually do not apply).
Implementing an HRA in California involves state-specific dynamics that HR teams must navigate, particularly regarding geographic rating regions, the state exchange, and state tax laws.
Health insurance premiums in the individual market are largely determined by where the employee lives. California is divided by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and the Department of Insurance (CDI) into 19 distinct Geographic Rating Regions.
The cost of healthcare in Region 4 (San Francisco) is significantly higher than in Region 13 (Mono, Inyo, Imperial counties). Because ICHRA allows classing by rating region, California employers with statewide workforces can index their contributions to the reality of the local market. Instead of offering a flat $500 to everyone—which might buy a robust plan in Fresno but fall short in Silicon Valley—an employer can tailor the allowance to ensure equitable purchasing power across all 19 regions.
When an employer offers an ICHRA, the employees must purchase their own ACA-compliant individual coverage. In California, this primarily happens through Covered California, the state’s official ACA marketplace, though employees can also purchase “off-exchange” plans directly from carriers like Blue Shield, Health Net, or Kaiser.
It is critical to communicate to employees that they must enroll in individual health coverage to receive the HRA funds. Short-term limited duration insurance, healthcare sharing ministries, and standard indemnity plans do not qualify. The employee must have ACA-compliant Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC).
In 2020, California implemented a state-level individual mandate, enforced by the Franchise Tax Board (FTB). California residents who fail to maintain continuous qualifying health coverage face a state tax penalty at the end of the year.
By offering an ICHRA or QSEHRA, employers provide their workforce with the financial mechanism to purchase this required coverage, helping employees avoid the FTB penalty while allowing the employer to secure tax-deductible benefits.
For small businesses (under 50 FTEs), offering health benefits is optional. But for Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees, the ACA Employer Mandate strictly requires the organization to offer health coverage that is both “affordable” and provides “minimum value,” or face severe IRS penalties under Section 4980H(a) and (b).
The ICHRA was legally engineered to satisfy this mandate, but the compliance mechanics require precision.
To avoid the “B Penalty” (Section 4980H(b)), the ICHRA allowance you offer must make an individual health plan “affordable” for the employee.
In traditional group insurance, affordability is calculated based on the employee’s share of the premium for the lowest-cost plan you offer. With an ICHRA, affordability is calculated by looking at the cost of the lowest-cost Silver plan available to the employee on the individual market in their geographic rating area, minus the ICHRA allowance you provide. The remaining amount the employee would theoretically have to pay cannot exceed a set percentage of their household income (this percentage is adjusted annually by the IRS; for historical reference, it hovers between 8% and 9.5%).
Because employers do not know their employees’ exact household incomes, the IRS allows ALEs to use one of three Affordability Safe Harbors to prove their ICHRA meets the mandate:
Because individual market premiums vary by the employee’s exact residence (by ZIP code or county), ALEs are allowed to use the “Primary Site of Employment” location safe harbor. Instead of calculating the lowest-cost Silver plan for every single employee’s unique home address, the employer can base the affordability calculation on the lowest-cost Silver plan available at the company’s office location or the employee’s primary worksite.
If an ALE offers an ICHRA that is mathematically deemed “unaffordable” (perhaps the employer only offers a $100/month allowance, leaving a heavy burden on the employee), the employee has a legal right. They can formally opt out of the ICHRA and go to Covered California to claim Premium Tax Credits (APTC) instead, provided they meet income eligibility.
If the ICHRA is affordable under the safe harbors, the employee is blocked from receiving APTC, even if they choose not to use the ICHRA.
Determine whether your business should deploy a QSEHRA or an ICHRA.
| Requirement | QSEHRA | ICHRA |
|---|---|---|
| Employer Size | Under 50 FTEs strictly | No limit (Works for ALEs) |
| Max Contribution Limit | IRS Capped (Adjusted Annually) | No limit |
| Can mix with traditional group? | No. Never. | Yes, if class rules are met. |
| Vary amounts by class? | No (Only by age/family size) | Yes (11 permitted classes) |
Switching to an HRA removes the burden of managing an annual group plan renewal, negotiating with carriers, and explaining copays to frustrated employees. However, it introduces a completely new set of administrative tasks. It is legally perilous to attempt to self-administer an ICHRA or QSEHRA via spreadsheets and payroll software alone.
Under IRS rules, you cannot simply give an employee an extra $500 a month in their paycheck and call it a health allowance. That constitutes taxable income.
To maintain the tax-free status of an HRA, every single reimbursement must be formally substantiated. The employee must prove two things:
This means someone must collect, review, and approve employee medical receipts and insurance statements. Because of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), internal HR departments should almost never handle raw medical receipts directly, as this exposes the company to massive privacy liabilities.
Because of the substantiation requirement, the vast majority of employers use an HRA Administration Platform or a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) to run their ICHRA or QSEHRA.
The TPA handles the heavy lifting:
The administrative fee for an HRA TPA typically ranges from $15 to $30 per employee, per month—a marginal cost compared to the legal protection and operational bandwidth it saves the company.
Both QSEHRA and ICHRA are technically classified as self-insured group health plans under federal law, meaning they are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
Employers must maintain a formal Written Plan Document and provide a Summary Plan Description (SPD) to all eligible employees. Furthermore, under an ICHRA, employers must provide a formal written notice to employees at least 90 days before the start of the plan year, explaining how the ICHRA interacts with Premium Tax Credits. Failure to provide these notices triggers heavy Department of Labor penalties.
One of the massive hidden benefits of an ICHRA is how it simplifies COBRA administration.
When an employee with traditional group health insurance is terminated, the employer must offer them COBRA—allowing them to stay on the corporate group plan, usually at massive expense, while HR tracks their premium payments.
With an ICHRA, the individual insurance policy belongs to the employee. When they are terminated, they take the policy with them. There is no traditional COBRA administration for the policy itself. The employer is merely required to offer COBRA for the ICHRA allowance account, which former employees almost never elect because they would have to pay the employer the value of the allowance plus a 2% administrative fee just to have that same money reimbursed back to them.
The financial architecture of an HRA is highly efficient for both the employer and the employee.
Every dollar an employer pays out in actual reimbursements through a compliant ICHRA or QSEHRA is fully tax-deductible as a standard business expense. Notably, you only pay for what employees actually use. If you offer a $500/month allowance, but an employee only buys a $300/month policy and has no other eligible expenses, you only spend $300. The unused allowance stays in the company’s accounts.
For the employee, the reimbursements are entirely tax-free. They are exempt from federal income tax, California state income tax, and FICA payroll taxes.
For ALEs utilizing an ICHRA to satisfy the employer mandate, the offer of coverage must be reported on the employee’s Form W-2 and on the employer’s ACA reporting forms (Forms 1094-C and 1095-C). The reporting codes specifically denote that an ICHRA was offered, the affordability safe harbor utilized, and whether the employee enrolled.
| Feature | Traditional Fully Insured | QSEHRA | ICHRA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Control | Determined by carrier, volatile annual renewals | Strict fixed budget set by employer | Strict fixed budget set by employer |
| Employee Choice | Limited to 1-3 plans selected by employer | Any ACA plan in their geographic region | Any ACA plan in their geographic region |
| Risk Pool | Based on company demographics and claims | Insulated; risk lies in the individual market pool | Insulated; risk lies in the individual market pool |
| HR Burden | High (Open enrollment, COBRA, carrier billing) | Moderate (TPA handles receipt substantiation) | Moderate (TPA handles receipt substantiation) |
| Best Fit For | Companies needing uniform, highly competitive benefits | Micro-businesses (<50 FTEs) with tight budgets | Distributed workforces, ALEs needing cost control, startups |
Choosing to pivot away from a traditional group health plan toward a defined contribution model is a strategic decision. It is not universally the best fit for every organization. Here is how to evaluate the real-world applicability for your company.
You should consider a QSEHRA if:
You should consider an ICHRA if:
You should stay with Traditional Fully Insured Coverage if:
If you decide an ICHRA or QSEHRA is the right strategic move, implementation requires a sequential approach. You cannot launch an HRA overnight.
By taking a structured, compliant approach, California employers can utilize QSEHRA and ICHRA to finally gain total control over their healthcare budget while simultaneously offering their employees personalized, portable coverage.
Our licensed advisors can help you design the perfect ICHRA or QSEHRA strategy, run affordability models, and map out the exact tax benefits for your California workforce.
Get a Free Consultation